A comunidade acadêmica brasileira publicou um manifesto internacional contra a tentativa de impedimento presidencial do governo Dilma Rousseff. O documento, que pode ser lido em inglês (abaixo), português, espanhol e francês, na plataforma Brazil Observatory conta com mais de 3 mil assinaturas. O manifesto representa um esforço coletivo da comunidade de pesquisadores e pesquisadoras brasileiros/as, e eventuais apoiadores, de alertar a comunidade internacional sobre a tentativa de golpe constitucional atualmente em curso no Brasil, encabeçado pela oposição conservadora à presidente Dilma, setores do judiciário e a principal organização de comunicação do país, o Grupo Globo.
A carta procura contextualizar o problema da corrupção política no país, destacando o papel central dos líderes da oposição no escândalo da Lava Jato, registrando as ameaças às proteções constitucionais e o uso seletivo das investigações e, finalmente, o uso estratégico da operação como uma tentativa inconstitucional de alterar o ciclo eleitoral brasileiro. Como concluiu o documento:
"O risco da ruptura da legalidade, por uma associação entre setores do Poder Judiciário e de meios de comunicação historicamente alinhados com a oligarquia política brasileira, em particular a Rede Globo de Televisão – apoiadora e principal veículo de sustentação da ditadura militar (1964-1985) -, pode comprometer a democracia brasileira, levando a uma situação de polarização e de embates sem precedentes. Por isso gostaríamos de pedir a solidariedade e o apoio da comunidade acadêmica internacional, em defesa da legalidade e das instituições democráticas no Brasil".
Open Letter to the International Academic Community
We, professors and researchers from Brazilian universities, hereby address the International Academic Community to report serious breaches in the rule of law currently taking place in Brazil.
After a long history of coups and a violent military dictatorship, our country has enjoyed its longest period of democratic stability since the 1988 Constitution established a number of individual and civil rights.
Despite progress in recent years with respect to social policy, Brazil remains a deeply unequal country with a political system marked by high levels of patronage and corruption. The influence of big business in the electoral process through private campaign financing has led to consecutive corruption scandals involving politicians from all sides.
In recent years, a national outcry against corruption has increasingly dominated public opinion. Public accountability and law enforcement agencies have responded by intensifying anti-corruption efforts, targeting major companies and political elites.
Unfortunately, this laudable process has been used to destabilize a democratically elected government, resulting in an exacerbation of the current economic and political crisis in our country. The same judiciary that should protect the political and legal integrity of our country has become an epicenter of this process.
The main anti-corruption investigation, the “Operação Lava Jato” (Operation Car Wash), is headed by a lower level federal judge, Sérgio Moro, who has systematically utilized procedures that Brazilian legislation clearly defines as exceptional, such as pre-trial detention and coercive transportation of witnesses for depositions. Arbitrary detentions have been openly justified as a method to pressure the accused into accepting plea bargains in which they denounce alleged accomplices. Information about the cases has been regularly and selectively leaked to the media. Indeed, evidence suggests that the press has received prior information about important police operations so as to mobilize public opinion against the accused. Even the nation’s President was targeted by an illegal wiretap. The above-named judge subsequently handed over excerpts of both legal and illegal wiretaps to the press for public disclosure, even when they involved private discussions with no relevance to the investigation. The purpose was clearly to embarrass specific politicians.
Complaints against leaders of political parties in the opposition have been disregarded and silenced by the mainstream press. At the same time, although the “Operação Lava Jato” has has yet to accuse President Dilma Roussef, the corruption investigations have been used to support impeachment proceedings in the House of Representatives, led by Speaker Eduardo Cunha, an opposition congressmen. Cunha, however, is accused of corruption and is being investigated by Ethics Committee of the same House.
When the actions of public authorities begin to challenge basic legal rights such as the presumption of innocence, equal protection, and due process, we must exercise caution. When noble ends seem to justify procedural breaches, the danger is enormous.
Sérgio Moro does not have the necessary exemption and impartiality to head the current investigations. The fight against corruption must be conducted within strict legal boundaries that respect the fundamental rights of defendants.
Segments of the judiciary involved in this process have worked in close in alliance with the mainstream media, that has been historically aligned with Brazil’s political oligarchy. In particular, the country’s largest television station, the Globo Television Network, openly supported the military dictatorship (1964-1985).
We fear that the breakdown of the rule of law underway is a threat to Brazilian democracy that may lead to grave and even violent social polarization.
For these reasons, we ask our colleagues abroad for solidarity and support in the defense of legality and of Brazil’s democratic institutions.
